Yes, I still would like to know why Julian Assange isn't under indictment for treason or espionage (read the law. He's guilty of both), and then ... well, file this under Silver Linings.
Apparently, one document leaked contains info on the fact that Cuba, which appeared in a Michael Moore documentary on health care to illustrate what good socialist medical policy can do, has banned the film in Cuba. Seems the Castro folks didn't want the people of Cuba to be reminded that the healthcare facility pictured in fatso's film exists since they can't avail themselves of it — unless they know someone to bribe.
Also according to the leaked document, some Cuban doctors walked out of a screening of the flic (as in movie, not French cop) in protest.
This begs a couple of questions. If the left says this is untrue, then what does that mean for the rest of the Wikileaks releases? If they say it's true, then what does this mean for their raves about Moore's "documentary?" Can't have it both ways, like Libs and Lefties always want.
Oh, and check this out: Moore has donated money to the Assange defense fund!
Yes, indeed, sometimes life is good.
The ramblings, meanderings and personal opinions about war, politics, adventure and anything else that strikes my fancy.
Showing posts with label Wikileaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wikileaks. Show all posts
18 December 2010
25 August 2010
$5 FOR THE LONGEST SHOT

I got $5 bucks for the person who makes the longest hit on this target.
But it's gotta look like you only did it because you were trying to uphold journalistic truth and honesty.
30 July 2010
IT'S GEORGE'S FAULT
Here's the White House's official position on Assange's Wikileaks spying (and the mutt MSMs who printed the crap) that is going to be responsible for the deaths of our guys and our allies' people.
"The period of time covered in these documents (January 2004-December 2009) is before the President announced his new strategy. Some of the disconcerting things reported are exactly why the President ordered a three month policy review and a change in strategy."
Now there's a man I can salute.
Right.
"The period of time covered in these documents (January 2004-December 2009) is before the President announced his new strategy. Some of the disconcerting things reported are exactly why the President ordered a three month policy review and a change in strategy."
Now there's a man I can salute.
Right.
28 July 2010
TALIBAN RESPONSE TO WIKILEAKS
While Haqqani said the leaked reports were useful to him, he also said he wished they had been leaked earlier because they provided evidence of American brutality in Afghanistan.
MORE AT: The Daily Beast.
MORE AT: The Daily Beast.
27 July 2010
OKAY, I'M BACK

Perhaps not as often as before, but I am firing this blog back up.
This return entry concerns WikiLeaks head honcho, Aussie, Julian Assange ... the man proudly behind leaking the Afghanistan documents, that — regardless of what ANYbody says — will result in some dead GIs/NATO troops, one way or the other.
Here's what this bottom feeder looks like.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)