Okay, from the headlines and whatnot after the president's Tuesday night speech, here's the way it looks like the MSM is planning to get him re-elected.
First off the Romney-Gingrich GOP nominee line: You'll probably hear and/or read nothing but how the two are polling equal. When something else will be reported it will only have to do with Romney — the left and the Dems are afraid of him because they apparently realize he can beat their boy. There will be NO mention of Mitt without the inclusion of the keywords "Mormon," "income tax," or "tithing," and will always make reference to his "corporate raiding," the latter, an arrogant assumption and a blatant lie, the three former ones irrelevant.
Secondly. There will only be reference to Gingrich in the context of Romney, but there will be a downplaying of any of Gingrich's faults, gaffes, etc. Slowly, the words "divorce," "Fannie Mae," "Freddie Mac," "DC insider," etc. will disappear from Newt stories. If there was a chance Newt could pull Indies, I'd probably vote for him, but there isn't, so Mitt's My Man.
Don't believe me? Watch. listen and learn how America got burned in the last election.
The ramblings, meanderings and personal opinions about war, politics, adventure and anything else that strikes my fancy.
Showing posts with label gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gingrich. Show all posts
25 January 2012
19 January 2012
CAN YOU IMAGINE
I'm not a Newt fan. I think Romney is our only chance for getting out from under the socialist agenda of which President Obama and his minions seem so fond.
That said, could you imagine if a media outlet like Fox opted to air an interview with, oh, say a former lover/ex of President Obama (assuming one exists. The man just doesn't seem to have a past as near as any "eyewitness investigator" has been "able" to find)?
No?
Well, ABC plans to air an interview with one of Newt's exes two days before the SC primary.
In the interest of fair and comprehensive reportage, of course.
Well, at least — instead of quoting Romney out of context — they're doing us a favor (much like ignoring the Paul campaign).
Oh, how I love an unbiased media!
That said, could you imagine if a media outlet like Fox opted to air an interview with, oh, say a former lover/ex of President Obama (assuming one exists. The man just doesn't seem to have a past as near as any "eyewitness
No?
Well, ABC plans to air an interview with one of Newt's exes two days before the SC primary.
In the interest of fair and comprehensive reportage, of course.
Well, at least — instead of quoting Romney out of context — they're doing us a favor (much like ignoring the Paul campaign).
Oh, how I love an unbiased media!
23 August 2010
LUPICA CHIMES IN ON GZ MOSQUE
The Daily News' version of ex-jock sniffer Keith Olberman chimed in on the GZ mosque issue — predictably — by announcing how scary Newt Gingrich is because he notes that you can't build Nazi meeting halls next to DC's Holocaust Museum, or a Japanese shrine next to the USS Arizona memorial.
Of course Little Lupey finds Gingrich using those type comparisons "scary" and "right wing." He also manages to take a shot at Sarah Palin for some reason.
(He also mentions crowd numbers, but doesn't distinguish how many of which side. Nice reportage, Mike).
Mike, go back to sports. At least your material is less trite and hackneyed there.
When the hell are these raving libs going to get it? I guess they figure if you keeping saying someone's a right wing extremist, people will believe what they write after a while (apparently journalists aren't reading their own credibility polls).
But all they're doing is setting the stage for the disappearance — once again — of the left wing agenda fostered on us by this President and this Congress.
Note to MSM: It's about what's culturally — our culture — the correct thing o do.
Of course Little Lupey finds Gingrich using those type comparisons "scary" and "right wing." He also manages to take a shot at Sarah Palin for some reason.
(He also mentions crowd numbers, but doesn't distinguish how many of which side. Nice reportage, Mike).
Mike, go back to sports. At least your material is less trite and hackneyed there.
When the hell are these raving libs going to get it? I guess they figure if you keeping saying someone's a right wing extremist, people will believe what they write after a while (apparently journalists aren't reading their own credibility polls).
But all they're doing is setting the stage for the disappearance — once again — of the left wing agenda fostered on us by this President and this Congress.
Note to MSM: It's about what's culturally — our culture — the correct thing o do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)